Sunday 11 March 2012

January in Victorian Edinburgh


5th January 1869
The Scotsman Newspaper has an article on ‘The use of Laughing Gas as an
Anaesthetic’ – ‘In the early part of last year the attention of the medical and
dental professions was recalled to the value of protoxide of nitrogen, more
commonly called laughing-gas, as an anaesthetic agent…..whilst some at
once condemned the use of the agent as dangerous in any case, others
declared that it was calculated to supersede chloroform…….One very
curious illustration of the mode of action of the gas…..In some cases patients
awake with the same idea in the mind that was present when they became
unconscious……one patient who before inhaling apologised for his
nervousness, continued his apologies as he recovered consciousness.’

Many experiments were carried out around this time to find suitable
anesthetics, as without it, operations had to be carried out very quickly to
avoid the patient dying from shock. Anesthetics such as nitrous oxide, ether
and chloroform were tried, in order to enable surgeons to take more time and
care with operations and also carry out more complex procedures.
Edinburgh Obstetrician, James Young Simpson’s experimentation with
chloroform helped to advance the use of anesthetics, and chloroform in
particular, became popular, having been used by Queen Victoria during
childbirth in 1853. Nitrous oxide, although useful, was not considered strong
enough for use in large operations, and became more commonly used in
dental procedures.

6th January 1870
Stealing eight hams resulted in Andrew Dow, residing in the Lawnmarket, appearing
in the Sheriff Court on this date. Dow had broken into the cellar of a grocer in
Fountainbridge, where he had procured the hams. He was sentenced to six months
imprisonment.

8th January 1869
In The Edinburgh Evening Courant, an article on ‘Poisonous Lotions for the
Hair’ – ‘Nothing is more extraordinary than the irrational credulity of even
educated, intelligent persons, in accepting a tradesman’s puff as a genuine
warranty. When, for instance, will people be warned against the use of
poisonous hair dyes? It can be no secret that white lead is the chief
ingredient in the black dyes now so largely sold….Paralysis, in a more or
less severe form, is the inevitable consequence of applying these lotions to
the hair.’

17th January 1893
A peculiar case of Culpable Homicide was heard in the Sheriff Court on this date.
Mary Dunnigan, who had been attempting to throw a metal watch stand at her
husband, with whom she often quarrelled, missed her husband, and instead struck her
daughter, Alice Dunnigan, with it. Mary Dunnigan took her daughter to the
dispensary for medical assistance and was advised to take her to the Infirmary.
However, she did not and the child only arrived at the Infirmary when she was taken
there by the police. The Sheriff in this case passed a sentence of eight months
imprisonment.

Attack with a Hatchet
In January 1893, a case went to trial involving a man named Patrick Griffin, who was
charged with having killed Edward Wynn with a hatchet and a poker, in the house of
labourer, Martin Moffat in the Lawnmarket. Moffat gave evidence that Griffin came
to the house on the day of the incident and had been told to leave as his company was
not wanted. However, Griffin came back in shortly afterwards, seized a hatchet
which was lying by the side of the fire, struck Moffat with it, and when Wynn tried to
take it from him, Griffin struck him on the head. As Wynn was being escorted
downstairs, Griffin struck him with a poker. The post mortem examination had been
carried out by Dr Littlejohn and Dr Joseph Bell, who found a wound on the scalp
about one inch in length on the left side of the head. The bones of the nose were
fractured and there was a wound on the back of his right hand. Their opinion, as a
result of the examination, was that Wynn died from acute inflammation of the
membranes of the brain, caused by external violence. Dr Littlejohn, giving evidence,
stated that judging from the peculiar indentation of the bone of the skull, some
weapon must have been used, and that the hatchet shown was a likely instrument to
have produced the indentation. Dr Littlejohn also said that in his opinion, if the
wound had been attended to immediately after the injury was inflicted; it was highly
probable that he would have recovered. This was corroborated by Dr Bell. Other
witnesses interviewed said that Griffin had been chased downstairs by three men, who
were somewhat the worse for drink and that Griffin had taken refuge in a
neighbouring house, but was set upon by three men in the close upon leaving this
house. The jury however, found Griffin guilty of Culpable Homicide and he was
sentenced to six months imprisonment.










No comments:

Post a Comment